...Ergo Fuero ("I blog; therefor I shall have been!") : Critical Epistemology For The Coming Revolution
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
No Going Back...
Lord Dampnut, the Doucheviks and the whole GOPhux have "crossed the Rubicon." That is, they are "all in," and they're not backing up a single fucking step. They have taken measures from which there is no way back.
And Woody'z pretty sure that our vaunted, touted 'System of Checks & Balances'--which have done fuck all, so far, to restrain Lord Dampnut--won't save us, this time, because they CANNOT: they were never devised to deal with such a scenario as this... We, the most powerful Empire ever to bestride the planet, have "shit the bed." We have done that for which there is NO "undoing." There's the old adage...
Ol' Pal and worldly observer Prof. Wombat (Michael Kempster) opined:
"(T)he Constitution and the law have proven themselves utterly inadequate to stop a determined, ruthless, relentless minority party from seizing control of every lever of power in the country.
"And a constitutional convention, which would again be constitutional if called by the states under Republican control, would be the death of the republic, nothing less."
And folks call me a "fatalist" and a "nihilist" and a "cynic" and a "pessimist" for harboring--and worse, expressing--similar observations and conclusions.
But it seems to me one would have to be willfully ignoring the signs and portents NOT to have such concerns...NOT that there is anything ANYBODY can do about it.
And, anyway, what could possibly go wrong?
Sunday, March 11, 2018
Racial and Gender Privileges Overlap A Lot.
The Male Privilege Checklist
An Unabashed Imitation of an Article by Peggy McIntosh
(Source: Expository Magazine, Volume 2, Issue 2. Copyright © 2001 - 2002 Barry Deutsch. Permission is granted to reproduce this list in any way, for any purpose, so long as the acknowledgment of Peggy McIntosh's work for inspiring this list is not removed25 .)
The Male Privilege Checklist1 My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favour. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed.
2 I can be confident that my co-workers won't think I got my job because of my sex - even though that might be true.
3 If I am never promoted, it's not because of my sex.
4 If I fail in my job or career, I can feel sure this won't be seen as a black mark against my entire sex's capabilities.
5 The odds of my encountering sexual harassment on the job are so low as to be negligible.
6 If I do the same task as a woman, and if the measurement is at all subjective, chances are people will think I did a better job.
7 If I'm a teen or adult, and if I can stay out of prison, my odds of being raped are so low as to be negligible.
8 I am not taught to fear walking alone after dark in average public spaces.
9 If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be called into question.
10 If I have children but do not provide primary care for them, my masculinity will not be called into question.
11 If I have children and provide primary care for them, I'll be praised for extraordinary parenting if I'm even marginally competent.
12 If I have children and pursue a career, no one will think I'm selfish for not staying at home.
13 If I seek political office, my relationship with my children, or who I hire to take care of them, will probably not be scrutinized by the press.
14 Chances are my elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex.
15 The more prestigious and powerful the elected position, the more likely this is to be true.
16 I can be somewhat sure that if I ask to see "the person in charge," I will face a person of my own sex. The higher-up in the organization the person is, the surer I can be.
17 As a child, chances are I was encouraged to be more active and outgoing than my sisters.
18 As a child, I could choose from an almost infinite variety of children's media featuring positive, active, non-stereotyped heroes of my own sex. I never had to look for it; male heroes were the default.
19 As a child, chances are I got more teacher attention than girls who raised their hands just as often.
20 If my day, week or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether or not it has sexist overtones.
21 I can turn on the television or glance at the front page of the newspaper and see people of my own sex widely represented, every day, without exception.
22 If I'm careless with my financial affairs it won't be attributed to my sex.
23 If I'm careless with my driving it won't be attributed to my sex.
24 I can speak in public to a large group without putting my sex on trial.
25 If I have sex with a lot of people, it won't make me an object of contempt or derision.
26 There are value-neutral clothing choices available to me; it is possible for me to choose clothing that doesn't send any particular message to the world.
27 My wardrobe and grooming are relatively cheap and consume little time.
28 If I buy a new car, chances are I'll be offered a better price than a woman buying the same car.
29 If I'm not conventionally attractive, the disadvantages are relatively small and easy to ignore.
30 I can be loud with no fear of being called a shrew. I can be aggressive with no fear of being called a bitch.
31 I can ask for legal protection from violence that happens mostly to men without being seen as a selfish special interest, since that kind of violence is called "crime" and is a general social concern. (Violence that happens mostly to women is usually called "domestic violence" or "acquaintance rape," and is seen as a special interest issue.)
32 I can be confident that the ordinary language of day-to-day existence will always include my sex. "All men are created equal…," mailman, chairman, freshman, he.
33 My ability to make important decisions and my capability in general will never be questioned depending on what time of the month it is.
34 I will never be expected to change my name upon marriage or questioned if i don't change my name.
35 The decision to hire me will never be based on assumptions about whether or not I might choose to have a family sometime soon.
36 Every major religion in the world is led primarily by people of my own sex. Even God, in most major religions, is usually pictured as being male.
37 Most major religions argue that I should be the head of my household, while my wife and children should be subservient to me.
38 If I have a wife or girlfriend, chances are we'll divide up household chores so that she does most of the labour, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks.
39 If I have children with a wife or girlfriend, chances are she'll do most of the childrearing, and in particular the most dirty, repetitive and unrewarding parts of childrearing.
40 If I have children with a wife or girlfriend, and it turns out that one of us needs to make career sacrifices to raise the kids, chances are we'll both assume the career sacrificed should be hers.
41 Magazines, billboards, television, movies, pornography, and virtually all of media are filled with images of scantily clad women intended to appeal to me sexually. Such images of men exist, but are much rarer.
42 I am not expected to spend my entire life 20-40 pounds underweight.
43 If I am heterosexual, it's incredibly unlikely that I'll ever be beaten up by a spouse or lover.\; and finally,
44 I have the privilege of being unaware of my male privilege.
Friday, March 9, 2018
Anosognosia, Revisited...
Ex-Prez LowBarry, apart from his election, was kinda disappointing to Black Americans. The author of this article, a senior prof of Af.Am. Studies at Duke, thinks so. Obama didn't "do enough to mitigate economic inequality," it is said.
And it's true.
Tho, of course, much of which he would have been prevented from doing by GOPhux majorities after 2010, even if he'd wanted to...
But he also lacked the will:
Back in '08, after the election installing Obama, I wrote the following:
"HOW nominally reasonable, normally intelligent people could ever THINK that the real owners of the country--oligarchs, plutocrats, aristos-- would EVER turn management of THEIR "property," or the system of its administration, over to somebody--to ANYBODY--who wasn't utterly, totally, and completely trustworthy; to someone who posed even the tiniest, remotest, slightest, slimmest CHANCE of undoing the least jot or tittle of their immensely profitable, unimaginably powerful status quo? Unthinkable.
No. That's preposterous! Who could believe such a thing?And it didn't happen, here, either..
Thus, "thePrez-elect" MUST already have faithfully demonstrated to the relevant authorities that he neither will, nor even particularly wants to, upset any plutocratic or hegemonic applecarts, or otherwise in any way disturb the Owners in their well-earned rest...
And to ignore or deny this quite evident set of facts is a text-book example of "Anosognosia."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)